Thursday, January 22nd, 2015 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog, Elections, Family Values
Today, thousands of people across the nation descend on Washington, DC for the 42nd Annual March for Life.
It’s been 42 years to the day since the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision to legalize abortion came down — and passionate activists have been pushing back against it ever since.
In the past few years, the life movement has gained momentum, thanks to gains in scientific knowledge and cultural awareness. The country has pivoted toward a much more pro-life view, with more Americans identifying themselves as such.
The March comes just one day after the GOP decided to pull a bill that would ban late-term abortions after 20 weeks. The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act had already faced a promise of a veto from President Obama, but it was expected to pass the House.
Some establishment Republican lawmakers, lead by Rep. Renee Elmers (R-NC), feared that dealing with this issue could hurt their chances with millennials and women, but they clearly aren’t listening to the American people.
A new poll shows that 60% of Americans support a ban on abortions after 20 weeks, which is just one week shy of a baby feasibly being able to survive outside the womb on its own.
The disappointment will serve only to embolden marchers more, as they brave the cold temperatures in what’s been called, “the nation’s largest and most enduring peaceful protest.”
Over 56 million children have been killed by abortion since Roe v. Wade, but states are making strides every year to protect both women and the unborn from the awful consequences of abortion.
The Madison Project is proud to endorse only pro-life candidates and conservatives who believe in the fight for protecting life before birth. Today, they are proud to stand with those who March for Life.
Wednesday, January 21st, 2015 by Madison Project Staff and is filed under Blog, Immigration
Let’s be very clear on something. When the Republican-controlled United States House of Representatives voted 236-191 to defund President Obama’s executive order giving amnesty to illegal immigrants last week, only a minority of its members did so out of principle.
The remainder, especially the GOP leadership, signaled their votes were not against amnesty. In spite of campaign rhetoric that suggests otherwise, they want it as a payoff for their friends at the Chamber of Commerce. They just don’t want the President stepping on their toes to do so. More importantly, they have to find a way to thread the needle so as to fool (they hope) their conservative base, a base adamantly opposed to amnesty for illegal immigrants.
It was the conundrum of the entire 2014 political cycle for the Establishment. With their friends at the Chamber of Commerce pushing “comprehensive” immigration reform on the Hill in Washington, DC and playing heavily in primaries against conservative candidates, it was clear that the Chamber and Establishment had one objective in mind this election season: to elect a majority of amnesty friendly Republicans.
The trick was getting them past the electorate, which, as we have noted, was accomplished by telling voters what they wanted to hear, not what they were actually going to do.
In fact, the Chamber’s political director, Rob Engstrom, recently took a leave of absence to help Jeb Bush’s Presidential campaign get off the ground, a campaign whose core tenets of amnesty and Common Core are not going to mesh with the conservative base that votes in the primaries (issues that the Chamber proactively spent millions of dollars on last year).
With the House passed bill that stripped funding for amnesty about to be taken up by the Senate, the political gamesmanship has already begun and this is how it will play out.
Any amendments, especially the Aderholdt amendment, that strip funding for amnesty from the Department of Homeland Funding bill will mysteriously disappear in the black hole of principle called the Senate because, “The votes just aren’t there!” and “The President will veto this anyway, so why bother?”
While saying all the right things (as he is known to do), the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell is currently finding ways to remove the “offending” portions of the House bill to send it back to the House. The messaging will be, “Yes, we may have the House and the Senate, but without the White House, there is only so much we can do. We must avoid a government shutdown!”
Now, if this seems like a Charlie Brown moment for the conservative movement, you would be correct in that assumption. The GOP Establishment promised over and over again this past election cycle, “If you just put us on the field, we’re going to score for you!” Lucy-like, however, they are getting ready to yank the ball away at the last minute and as the conservative movement whiffs and wonders where the ball went, the Establishment will again reiterate to us, “There is nothing we can do right now. Give us two more years to set the stage for taking the White House and THEN we can really get stuff done around here.”
While many cheered the House vote last week, it was simply a show vote. The real vote is going to happen when the Senate sends its version of the House bill (stripped of any and all defunding amendments) back to the House and asks the House to pass it.
This is the vote conservatives need to pay attention to and expect their Members to fight the GOP leadership in both chambers. It is here that we must put the pressure on conservatives in the House to take down the rule.
Friday, January 2nd, 2015 by Madison Project Staff and is filed under Blog, Elections
Today Congressman Jim Bridenstine announced that he will not be voting for John Boehner for Speaker of the House next Wednesday. Speaker Boehner has consistently undermined conservatives and actively worked with Democrats to pass legislation that increases the size and scope of government. We applaud Congressman Bridenstine’s principled stand and call on other Members to join him.
For Immediate Release:
January 2, 2015
Madison Project Praises Bridenstine
Fort Worth, TX – The Madison Project Political Director, Drew Ryun made the following statement today regarding Rep. Jim Bridenstine’s announcement that he will not support John Boehner for Speaker of the House:
“There are few principled leaders in Congress willing to fight for conservatives policies – Congressman Jim Bridenstine is one of them. Voters sent Republicans to Washington to oppose President Obama’s liberal policies not help them succeed. We need a Speaker of the House that actually listens to the grassroots of Main Street not the lobbyists on K Street.
“The Madison Project was proud to endorse Bridenstine for Congress and we’re proud to join him today as he stands with the conservative movement and defends the principles of freedom that make our nation great.”
The Madison Project supports and raises money for conservative candidates that have demonstrated a commitment to full-spectrum conservatism. The Madison Project website can be found at http://madisonproject.com/
Friday, December 19th, 2014 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog, Economy, Immigration
If you flipped on the news or scrolled through Twitter, you couldn’t have missed the epic statement made by Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Mike Lee this weekend.
At issue? President Obama’s executive amnesty. The two leading conservatives refused to let Obama’s unconstitutional actions venture on their merry way without a fight.
Just today, a federal judge ruled Obama’s actions were unconstitutional. But, of course, Sen. Harry Reid and his liberal friends will admit nothing of the sort. And most of them, as well as many Republicans, were whining all weekend about having to miss Christmas parties at home to work the weekend.
Sorry if the American people can’t muster up an ounce of sympathy for those complaining. Conservatives should be lauding Cruz and Lee for doing everything in their power to make this argument heard.
The lame duck congress is unfortunate for many reasons, but it boils down to this: The American people voted for a drastic change in leadership last month. It’s not okay for the losers to continue carrying out their failed policies — especially when conservatives have the opportunity to speak out.
The $1.1 trillion “CRomnibus” was irresponsible, full of unnecessary spending and plenty of issues unrelated to funding the government. At the end of the year, politicians get lazy — but not Cruz and Lee. They came to Washington for a reason — and it wasn’t to bow down to the status quo so they can make it home for the weekend Christmas party.
As former Senator Jim DeMint wrote: “There is absolutely zero debate within the Republican Party as to whether the President overstepped his constitutional authority or acted improperly.”
So why weren’t they backed by the entirety of the GOP? Now is the time to band together against the lawlessness represented by Obama’s amnesty — not criticize the guys making waves for the Left.
Republicans have a lot to prove in the next two years. With a starting point like this one, many conservatives are worried. But with leaders like Cruz and Lee standing up for the American people, there’s hope the majority will be heard and that valuable, long-term change will soon arise.
Monday, December 15th, 2014 by Madison Project Staff and is filed under Blog, Elections
In 2010, Senator Mike Lee stunned political pundits and the GOP Establishment, first by defeating incumbent Senator Bob Bennett at the Republican convention then winning a hotly contested primary against Tim Bridgewater before cruising to victory in November.
Son of Ronald Reagan’s Solicitor General, Rex Lee, Mike ran on a platform of limited government, repealing Obamacare, lowering taxes and fighting for the sanctity of life and marriage. In short, he was the epitome of what we at the Madison Project look for in candidates-a comprehensive conservative who could clearly enunciate the principles on which he was running.
As we all know, however, that the rhetoric candidates use to get elected and the actions they take once in office are often diametrically opposed to each other. The GOP class of 2010 in the United States is a clear example of this. In stark contrast to many of his classmates, Senator Mike Lee has been exactly the kind of Senator he said he would be. He has been a strong voice and vote for conservatives, even when the odds against him appear intimidating and insurmountable.
It is not often that we can look back over a 6-year term of a United States Senator and say without qualification that we are happy to endorse him. When it comes to Mike Lee, not only are we proud to endorse him again, we look forward to working with him for years to come as we fight to get this country back on track.
Wednesday, December 3rd, 2014 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog, Elections
Americans made a big play last month when they voted for a Republican Majority in both Houses of Congress.
It seems their message went further than just the voting booth, as well. A new Gallup poll comparing pre and post-election results shows that Americans now identify more strongly with the GOP than they did before the election.
With 42% of Americans identifying with them, Republicans have a slight lead over Democrats, who came in with only 41%, a 2 point decrease for them compared to pre-election results.
Past elections with similar results have also resulted in identity shifts. The question is, will the winning Party remain true to the promises that got them here?
It’s easy to spout lofty commitments on the campaign trail but the going gets tough once the lame duck session ends and January begins.
There is so much riding on this Congress. With more Americans than ever putting their faith in the GOP, they must deliver results on the big issues, like Obamacare, immigration and big government spending.
Too many times, we’ve seen well-meaning politicians get elected to office only to begin towing the Party line because it’s easier to play nice with Congressional leadership. It shouldn’t be easy and newly elected conservatives must stick to the strong principles that got them here.
After 6 years with the most liberal President in history, Americans are more than ready for lasting change in the right direction. The inside politics of Congress tempt new Members to compromise on their principles but that would be the worst thing any of them could do moving forward into 2015.
The Republican reputation is riding on this Congress and 2016 will be determined by exactly that.
Friday, November 28th, 2014 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog, Immigration
It seems that President Obama will do almost anything to secure the legacy he wants — even if that means making the American people dislike him.
His approval rating hasn’t been stellar for years, but he’s now at under 40% and things don’t seem to be moving in a positive direction, according to a Quinnipiac poll.
The recent dip is likely due to the drastic move he just made on immigration. In case you’ve been living under a rock, the President used executive action to implement his own personal immigration reform.
Last night, he was caught on tape admitting that he violated the Constitution, saying, “I just took action to change the law.”
He didn’t have to say it out loud for the truth to be revealed but it certainly solidifies what much of the nation already thinks.
And it’s not just a segment of people — it’s actually a widespread disapproval across party, age and gender. The under-30 Democrat crowd is excluded from that set but otherwise, it’s fair game from every angle.
The downfalls within in Obamacare, botched foreign policy and now, the move to offer amnesty to over 5 million people is taking it’s toll.
According to the Hill, “only 48 percent of American voters now say illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the U.S. with a pathway to citizenship — down 9 percentage points from a year ago.”
There has been outcry from legal immigrants who came to the United States and went through the legal immigration process. So many toiled for years to become citizens and now, individuals who broke the law and crossed the border will get that same opportunity at much less a personal cost.
President Obama may achieve his dream of allowing amnesty in America, but the legacy of that will have more consequences than he can imagine.
Tuesday, November 18th, 2014 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog
There’s more than one major issue coming to a head during the lame duck session of Congress this year. One of the biggest votes is happening tonight, on construction of the Keystone Pipeline.
While they still have some control, the Left would like to quell the debate on moving forward with the controversial legislation, but American energy prospects may put a damper on their hopes.
The Obama Administration has procrastinated on the issue for years, despite ample support from at least 62 Senators two years ago. Detractors say the pipeline will cause environmental stress but research has shown that not to be the case.
Heritage Foundation energy policy analyst Nick Loris wrote:
“The State Department has conducted multiple environmental reviews, concluding that the pipeline would be safe and not contribute significantly to climate change.”
Now, a bill in support of the Pipeline has passed the House and is currently awaiting a vote in the Senate. The Senate version is bipartisanly sponsored by Sen. Mary Landreiu (D-LA) and Sen. John Hoeven (R-ND) so supporters remain hopeful — but nothing is certain right now.
The bill easily passed the House but Hoeven told MSNBC earlier today that they had only 59 of the 60 necessary “yes” votes confirmed, with a few “maybes” on the fence.
In fact, even if the bill is passed in the Senate, President Obama will likely veto it. However, the political symbolism of the pipeline is part of why the votes politicians take on it matter. It has become a very visible issue representing expanding domestic energy production.
A majority of Americans support building Keystone and Speaker John Boehner said today that if Obama vetoes the bill, he’d be “calling the American people stupid.”
Landrieu is currently embroiled in a runoff Senate race with opponent Bill Cassidy. She’s taken Keystone on as a priority issue and is reported to have been scrambling today in effort to secure the necessary votes in the Senate.
The vote is set for Tuesday evening, so we’ll soon see if Washington had the guts to listen to the American people. If Obama vetoes a passed bill in both House and Senate, it will only serve to strengthen his reputation for unconstitutionally abusing executive power.
Friday, November 14th, 2014 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog, Foreign Policy
If you told candidate Barack Obama in 2008 that he’d be doubling troops in Iraq in the year 2014, after announcing he “ended the war in Iraq,” he would have laughed in your face. But reality is a funny thing, isn’t it?
Thankfully, Obama is listening to military leaders who have his ear at this crucial time to combat terrorism. With ISIS running rampant, murdering hostages and terrifying the Iraqi Army into hiding, it’s impossible for the United States to sit across the ocean and watch.
Today, Obama’s top military adviser Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he’s now open to considering U.S. ground troops to work with Iraqi Army to retake the city of Mosul.
Obama certainly doesn’t want troops on the ground but if he’s willing to heed Dempsey’s wisdom, that’s what we may soon see. And the public may actually be behind the strategy. In a a CBS News poll last month revealed that 71% of Americans said they supported continued air assaults against ISIS. More notably, 47% of Americans said they supported sending troops to Iraq, an increase of 9 percentage points since September.
Additionally, the White House proposes to request $5.6 billion for the campaign, with $1.6 billion of that segmented out for Iraqi troops.
In an interview about the troop upgrade, Obama called his move to double the troops “a new phase” and said that ISIS is not only a threat to Iraq but also to the surrounding region and ultimately, the United States.
“This is a threat we are not only committed to degrade, but also to destroy,” said Obama.
That’s the kind of language Americans have desperately needed to hear from the President for a long time. No one likes war — or wants to put our troops in harm’s way — but as the United States, we have a responsibility to lead the crusade against the terrorist thugs of ISIS
Tuesday, November 11th, 2014 by Ericka Andersen and is filed under Blog, Obamacare
Things continue to get worse for supporters of Obamacare. First, a key architect of the law revealed on camera how deceptive he and the Administration were in crafting the law so it would pass without transparency — “call it the stupidity of the American voter,” he said.
Now, another piece of the law is under continuing fire since the Supreme Court decided it would hear King v. Burwell after an appeal. This is just one of many issues with the law, which has, in fact, already been changed 42 times since it’s passage.
If a law has to be so completely hacked to death over such a short period of time, doesn’t that mean it wasn’t ready to go in the first place? That’s putting it nicely.
King v. Burwell regards whether or not the Obama Administration will provide tax credits to individuals who purchase insurances through the federal Obamacare exchanges – and not just to those using state-based exchanges.
The Supreme Court taking up the case alone makes the Administration look bad — but the confusing language inside the law only serves to confirm that deception via confusion was part of the plan all along.
The Obamacare architect in the video above said the law was “written in a tortured way” on purpose and that such tactics were “really critical in getting the thing to pass.”
Clearly, the tortured language has been torturing the American people since then, and that continues in this latest court case.
Part of getting people to buy into Obamacare was promising them their healthcare would be less expensive or that they’d receive tax breaks. If the Supreme Court now decides, via King v. Burwell, that individuals cannot receive subsidies through the federal exchange, then all the people in those states will be out of luck once again.
It will be yet another promise broken, another misleading part of a law that’s been everything but what many Americans though it would be.
When something is so bad it has to be written “in a tortured way” to deceive people — and revised 42 times in three years — it’s time to admit it shouldn’t have been passed in the first place.
Since Obamacare was passed, there have been plenty of conservative alternatives to consider but both Democrats and the media have ignored them. It’s time to put forward legislation that actually prioritizes Americans and puts the patient first.
Page 2 of 133«12345...102030...»Last »